Problem 01
Real numbers are given. For each
(
) define
and let
.
(a) Prove that, for any real numbers ,
(b) Show that there are real numbers such that equality holds in (*)
Solution
Since , all
can be expressed as
, where
.
Thus, can be expressed as
for some
and
,
Lemma)
Assume for contradiction that , then for all
,
Then, is a non-decreasing function, which means,
, and
, which means,
.
Then, and contradiction.
a)
Case 1)
If ,
is the maximum of a set of non-negative number, which must be at least
.
Case 2) (We can ignore
because of lemma)
Using the fact that can be expressed as
for some
and
,
.
Assume for contradiction that .
Then, ,
.
, and
Thus, and
.
Subtracting the two inequality, we will obtain:
--- contradiction (
).
Thus,
(b)
A set of where the equality in (*) holds is:
Since is a non-decreasing function,
is non-decreasing.
:
Let ,
.
Thus, (
because
is the max of a set including
)
Since and
,
Problem 02














Solution
![[asy] import cse5; import graph; import olympiad; dotfactor = 3; unitsize(1.5inch); path circle = Circle(origin, 1); draw(circle); pair D = (-sqrt(3)/2, -0.5), C = (sqrt(3)/2, -0.5); //G = bisectorpoint(C, B, D); pair Ee = rotate(38,C)*D; pair E = IP(C--Ee, circle,1); pair Gg = rotate(76,C)*D; path circle2 = Circle(E, length(C-E)); pair G = IP(C--Gg, circle2, 1); pair F = IP(C--D, circle2, 1); pair Bb = rotate(-104,C)*D; pair B = IP(C--Bb, circle, 1); pair A = extension((-1,B.y),(1,B.y),G,F); draw(circle2, dashed); draw(A--G); draw(C--D--A--B); draw(G--B); draw(E--F); draw(E--C); draw(E--G); dot("$C$", C, dir(30)); dot("$D$", D, SW); dot("$G$", G, SE); dot("$E$", E, SW); dot("$F$", F, SW); dot("$A$", A, SW); dot("$B$", B, SE); draw(D--E,dashed); draw(B--E,dashed); [/asy]](https://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/4/d/c4d6cd122415e7b7ccce4bdc0b15896ba36b846d.png)
Since ,
, it suffices to prove
.
Let ,
,
. We have:
so,
Meantime, using Law of Sines on
, we have,
Using Law of Sines on
, and notice that
, we have,
so,
Since
, and
, we have,
. Hence,
or,
There are two possibilities: (1)
, or (2)
. However, (2) would mean
, then
would be a diameter, and
because
is inside the circle, so (2) is not valid. From condition (1), we have
, therefore
.
Problem 03
Problem 04













Solution













![$\dfrac{[RPK]}{[RQL]}=\dfrac{BC*RP}{AC*RQ}$](https://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/5/f/85f87bfd1496e5b2816ac9e9999e5a93cc30c32a.png)
















Problem 05
Let and
be positive integers with
and
an even number. Let
lamps labelled
,
, ...,
be given, each of which can be either on or off. Initially all the lamps are off. We consider sequences of steps: at each step one of the lamps is switched (from on to off or from off to on).
Let be the number of such sequences consisting of
steps and resulting in the state where lamps
through
are all on, and lamps
through
are all off.
Let be number of such sequences consisting of
steps, resulting in the state where lamps
through
are all on, and lamps
through
are all off, but where none of the lamps
through
is ever switched on.
Determine .
Solution
For convenience, let denote the set
and
the set
.
We can describe each sequences of switching the lamps as a -dimensional vector
, where
signifies which lamp was switched on the
-th move for
.
Let consist of those sequences that contain each of the numbers in
an odd number of times and each of the numbers in
an even number of times. Similarly, let
denote the set of those sequences that contain no numbers from
and each of the numbers in
an odd number of times. By definition,
and
.
Define the mapping as
What we want to show now is that each element of is an image of exactly
elements from
, which would imply
and solve the problem.
Consider an arbitrary element of
and let
be the number of appearances of the number
in
for
. Now consider the set of pre-images of
, that is
.
It is easy to see that each element is derived from
by flipping an even number of its
-s,
-s, and so on, where flipping means changing the number
to
. Since each such set of flippings results in a unique
, all we want to count is the number of flippings. We can flip exactly
of the
-s, so that results in
flippings. Combine each of them with the
,
, etc. ways of flipping the
-s,
-s etc. respectively to get the total number of flippings:
This shows that
and the proof is complete.
Problem 06

![\[S=\{(x,y,z)~:~x,y,z\in \{0,1,\ldots,n \},~x+y+z>0\}\]](https://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/093e2981f00291b1f43718a1442f9967e2df0a27.png)



Solution
We will prove the result using the following Lemma, which has an easy proof by induction.
Lemma Let ,
and
. If
is a polynomial in
that vanishes on all points of the grid
except at the origin, then
Proof. We will prove this by induction on . If
, then the result follows trivially. Say
. WLOG, we can assume that
. By polynomial division over
we can write
Since
is a monomial, the remainder
must be a constant in
, i.e.,
is a polynomial in two variables
,
. Pick an element of
of the form
and substitute it in the equation. Since
vanishes on all such points, we get that
for all
. Let
and
. For every point
in
we have
where
. Therefore, the polynomial
vanishes on all points of
except the origin. By induction hypothesis, we must have
. But,
and hence we have
.
Now, to solve the problem let be
planes that cover all points of
except the origin. Since these planes don't pass through origin, each
can be written as
. Define
to be the polynomial
. Then
vanishes at all points of
except at the origin, and hence
.
No comments:
Post a Comment